Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 14 results ...

Ahmed, S M, Sang, L P and Torbica, & M (2003) Use of Quality Function Deployment in Civil Engineering Capital Project Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 358–68.

Allouche, E N, Ariaratnam, S T and MacLeod, C W (2003) Software for Planning and Cost Control in Directional Drilling Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 446–53.

Attalla, M and Hegazy, T (2003) Predicting Cost Deviation in Reconstruction Projects: Artificial Neural Networks versus Regression. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 405–11.

Chan, E H W and Tse, R Y C (2003) Cultural Considerations in International Construction Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 375–81.

Chang, A S and Tsai, Y (2003) Engineering Information Classification System. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 454–60.

Cheng, M and Ko, C (2003) Object-Oriented Evolutionary Fuzzy Neural Inference System for Construction Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 461–9.

Fu, W K, Drew, D S and Lo, H P (2003) Competitiveness of Inexperienced and Experienced Contractors in Bidding. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 388–95.

Hassim, S, Kadir, M R A, Lew, Y and Sim, Y (2003) Estimation of Minimum Working Capital for Construction Projects in Malaysia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 369–74.

Hegazy, T and Petzold, K (2003) Genetic Optimization for Dynamic Project Control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 396–404.

Ibbs, C W, Kwak, Y H, Ng, T and Odabasi, A M (2003) Project Delivery Systems and Project Change: Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 382–7.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Delivery; Project management; Design/build; project management; civil engineering; construction industry;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382)
  • Abstract:
    Design/build has become one of the favored project delivery methods in the engineering construction industry. Numerous studies have advocated the use of design/build over the traditional design/bid/build delivery approach. A comprehensive analysis of 67 global projects from the Construction Industry Institute's database shows that design/build projects may not provide all the benefits to project performance. The study found timesaving was a definitive advantage of design/build project delivery, but, the positive effects of cost and productivity changes were not convincing. Based on the results of the study, the project management expertise and experience of the contractor may have a greater impact on project performance outcomes than focusing on project delivery strategy only.

Lee, S and Halpin, D W (2003) Predictive Tool for Estimating Accident Risk. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 431–6.

Lu, M and Li, H (2003) Resource-Activity Critical-Path Method for Construction Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 412–20.

Navon, R and Goldschmidt, E (2003) Can Labor Inputs be Measured and Controlled Automatically?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 437–45.

Warszawski, A (2003) Analysis of Costs and Benefits of Tall Buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(04), 421–30.